An unnamed former Activision executive has filed a lawsuit against the Call of Duty publisher, alleging age discrimination and violations of whistleblower protection laws in California. This 57-year-old executive, who worked at the company from 2014, is one of six older men who were allegedly laid off as part of Activision Blizzard’s restructuring efforts in August last year. The lawsuit claims that the recently-departed CEO, Bobby Kotick, made remarks about “too many old white guys” at the company, which led to the departure of two white executives. Furthermore, it alleges that a younger non-white employee was promoted over the plaintiff, who then became the plaintiff’s manager and criticized his work. The lawsuit also mentions false and defamatory remarks made by a female colleague, as well as the plaintiff’s complaint to HR being ignored.
While the allegations of age discrimination and whistleblower violations are serious, it is important to critically analyze the situation. One must consider the demographic makeup of Activision Blizzard’s workforce, which according to their most recent Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Look-Back report, consists of 73% male employees and 61% white employees in the US. These numbers suggest that white males are not underrepresented at the company. However, it does not dismiss the possibility of age discrimination, which is a prevalent issue in various industries, as highlighted by Fallout’s original designer, Timothy Cain, who called it “the last publicly acceptable discrimination” in game development.
Statistics from a CompTIA survey in 2023 show that only a small percentage of tech workers and software developers over the age of 55 are employed in the USA, with figures at 17% and 14% respectively. This data indicates a potential bias towards younger hires within the industry. In response to this bias, a videogame union worker named Kate Edwards launched the “50 over 50” initiative in 2019, aiming to address the industry-wide preference for younger employees. Understanding this context sheds light on the plaintiff’s claims of ageism at Activision Blizzard and raises questions about the broader issue of age discrimination in the video game industry.
The lawsuit seeks damages for loss of earnings, negative career impact, damage to reputation, emotional distress, wrongful termination, and legal costs. However, Activision Blizzard has not provided an extensive public response to the claims, only referring to their equal employment opportunity policy when questioned by GamesIndustry.biz. It is worth noting that the company recently settled a lawsuit with the State of California regarding allegations of a “frat boy” culture, including sexual harassment, discrimination, and unequal pay. This context adds complexity to the current lawsuit and raises questions about Activision Blizzard’s workplace environment.
Regardless of the specific details of this lawsuit, it is crucial to acknowledge and address instances of discrimination in the workplace. Age discrimination, in particular, requires ongoing awareness and efforts to ensure fairness and equal opportunities for employees of all ages. Companies within the video game industry and beyond must cultivate inclusive environments that value diverse perspectives and talents. By doing so, they can create a more equitable future for all employees and foster innovation within their organizations.
As this lawsuit unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the court responds to the allegations of age discrimination and whistleblower violations. The outcome of the case could potentially set a precedent for future lawsuits within the industry and shed light on the need for greater accountability and transparency. Regardless of the outcome, it is vital for companies like Activision Blizzard to reflect on these allegations and take proactive steps to address any concerns raised by their employees. Only through a commitment to inclusivity and fairness can the video game industry truly thrive and fulfill its potential.
Leave a Reply